Hello, Maybe I missed something, but can someone tell me why the ontology of dbpedia is not listed on LOV [1]?
[1] http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/index.html Regards, Benedikt -- AIFB, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Phone: +49 721 608-47946 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.aifb.kit.edu/web/Hauptseite/en -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kingsley Idehen Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 1:09 AM To: Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche Cc: [email protected]; SW-forum; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: LOV - Linked Open Vocabularies On 3/28/11 5:37 PM, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche wrote: Kingsley, I've just added rdfs:isDefinedBy property to vocabularies which accept content negotiation. Example here: http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_voaf.html Okay, a few more things though. For instance, what type of Entity is Identified by this URI: http://labs.mondeca.com/vocab/voaf#VocabularySpace ? Effect of entity ambiguity shows here: http://uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flabs.mondeca.com%2Fvocab%2Fv oaf%23VocabularySpace . Also, we have an Entity ID (URI based Named Ref): http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/lov#CITY, and we (hopefully most Linked Data folk) kinda know said Entities representation (in the form of a linked data graph pictorial) is accessible from the Address (URL): http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/lov, but for absolute clarity (human and machines) you should add a wdrs:describedby relation of the form: <http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/lov#CITY> <http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/lov#CITY> wdrs:describedby <http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/lov> <http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/lov> . Good job! Kingsley regards, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche Research & Development Mondeca 3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France Tel. +33 (0)1 44 92 35 07 - fax +33 (0)1 44 92 02 59 Mail: [email protected] Website: www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com/> Blog: Leçons de choses <http://mondeca.wordpress.com/> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Kingsley Idehen <[email protected]> wrote: On 3/28/11 10:39 AM, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche wrote: Hello all, We are pleased to announce the Linked Open Vocabularies initiative [1]. The web of data is based on datasets publication. When building a dataset some questions arise: which existing vocabularies will be the best-suited for my needs? To facilitate this task we propose the Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV) dataset [1]. It identifies the defined vocabularies for data description but also the relationships between these vocabularies. The work within the LOV is not exhaustive but, by suggesting us some vocabulary modifications and/or creations, we could improve this dataset. You could access this dataset via an RDF/XML file [2] and via a SPARQL Endpoint [3]. [1] http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/index.html [2] http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/lov.rdf [3] http://labs.mondeca.com/endpoint/lov Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche, Bernard Vatant, Lise Rozat Research & Development Mondeca 3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France Website: www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com/> Lab: Mondeca Labs <http://labs.mondeca.com/> Nice! See: http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flabs.mondeca..com% 2Fdataset%2Flov%2Flov%23LOV Would be nice if you also added isDefinedBy relations so that one can FYN between TBox and ABox with ease :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen <http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/%7Ekidehen> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
