On 4/6/11 5:08 PM, glenn mcdonald wrote:
Context infidelity == you are shifting the landscape that define
the rules of the conversation I was trying to have.
Yes, I'm trying to shift the collective conversation around the LOD
Cloud to recognize and include the idea, which really ought to be
fairly uncontroversial, that quantity and quality are intertwined.
Verbosely reified CSV cells, as William noted, are a particularly
obvious example: they increase the number of triples out of proportion
to their usefulness.
If you don't want to participate in this part of the conversation,
don't. It's a public forum, nobody owns "the context". Until some more
people weigh in, I don't have any idea what "the list" (or, in this
case, the three lists) cares about. Raw scale? Accuracy? User
experience? Nine other things we haven't even mentioned? None of this?
Create a new conversation and then you own the context.
This is my last reply.
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President& CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
