On 4/7/11 6:24 PM, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program wrote:
Dear Kingsley,
If we look at what the ISO (www.iso.org) and in particular
http://metadata-stds.org/ defines as standards, it is the collective
framework of processes, methodologies and technologies used to produce
outputs that should safeguard/guarantee the quality.
This issue was brought up in an earlier thread on the quality and
standards for the production of ontologies.
It would be an excellent idea to deal with this issue in a separate
thread and possibly make related information available on a site (e.g.
wiki).
Okay, just start the thread you desire, or get Wiki in question going :-)
Kingsley
Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
Project Paradigm: A structured approach to bringing the tools for
sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide by creating ICT
tools for NGOs worldwide and: providing online access to web sites and
repositories of data and information for sustainable development
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager. This message contains confidential information and
is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named
addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
--- On *Thu, 4/7/11, Kingsley Idehen /<kide...@openlinksw.com>/* wrote:
From: Kingsley Idehen <kide...@openlinksw.com>
Subject: How Do with deal with the Subjective Matter of Data Quality?
To: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, "semantic-...@w3.org"
<semantic-...@w3.org>, "dbpedia-discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net"
<dbpedia-discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thursday, April 7, 2011, 5:56 PM
All,
Increasingly, the issue of data quality pops up as an impediment
to Linked Data value proposition comprehension and eventual
exploitation. The same issue even appears to emerge in
conversations that relate to "sense making" endeavors that benefit
from things such as OWL reasoning e.g., when resolving the
multiple Identifiers with a common Referent via owl:sameAs or
exploitation of fuzzy rules based on InverseFunctionProperty
relations.
Personally, I subscribe to the doctrine that "data quality" is
like "beauty" it lies strictly in the eyes of the beholder i.e., a
function of said beholders "context lenses".
I am posting primarily to open up a discussion thread for this
important topic.
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President& CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
<http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/%7Ekidehen>
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President& CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
