Thanks for sharing these, Christian! It sounds like a great project. Along with each criterion, it would be helpful to clearly indicate whether it should be increased or decreased to improve the quality.
e.g. instead of "Concept Redundancy" I would expect: "minimal concept redundancy" as a principle/criterion. -Jodi On 8 Apr 2011, at 16:18, Christian Mader wrote: > Hi, > > In the course of my PhD project at the University of Vienna I'm going to > address the question how to programmatically support collaborative creation > of "good-quality" SKOS vocabularies. I have found 14 criteria that, in my > opinion, could be used to assess the quality of said vocabularies. It would > be really helpful for me to get some community input on these criteria, so I > published them here: > > https://github.com/cmader/qSKOS/wiki/Quality-Criteria-for-SKOS-Vocabularies > > Please feel free to post your comments and suggestions regarding that matter, > every kind of input will be warmly appreciated. > > Best, > Christian > > -- > Research Group Multimedia Information Systems > Department of Distributed and Multimedia Systems > Faculty of Computer Science > University of Vienna > > Postal Address: Liebiggasse 4/3-4, 1010 Vienna, Austria > Phone: +43 1 4277 39623, Fax: +43 1 4277 39649 > E-Mail: [email protected] > >
