On 4/12/11 9:53 AM, glenn mcdonald wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Kingsley Idehen
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
1.
http://lod.openlinksw.com/describe/?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FMichael_Jackson
-- basic description of 'Micheal Jackson' from DBpedia
The very first assertion on this, your first link, is
"is sameAs of: Michael Rodrick". And you wonder why I keep distracting
your technology demos by talking about data quality...
Again, do you not understand the fundamental point? There is an
inaccurate assertion in a relation in a give data space. How do you fix
it if you can't see it in the first place? Subjectively bad data can
lead to subjectively improved data.
You take a single assertion from a 21 Billion+ data space, and decide
that's the essence of the matter. Finding this assertion (needle in the
21 Billion+ haystack) is part of the point. Negating the errant named
graph all together is another, post discovery. Not reasoning on owl:same
assertion is yet another.
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President& CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
