Hi Kingsley, I have a few questions. See below.
On 14 Jun 2011, at 22:24, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 6/13/11 9:29 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> >> Then you go on to say that it would be much better if it said: >> >> "id": "https://www.facebook.com/kidehen#this"; > > For the record, after scratching my head a few times following responses from > both Richard and Glenn re. item above, I now see that really meant to have > posted: > > https://graph.facebook.com/kidehen#this Would you agree that Facebook are the owners of this URI? Would you agree that the owner of a URI gets to decide what it identifies? Would you agree that a good URI is one where the URI owner has explicitly communicated (ideally through its representations) what it identifies? If I wanted to state, using Facebook URIs, that I know you, would you expect me to do this: <http://graph.facebook.com/richard.cyganiak#this> foaf:knows <http://graph.facebook.com/kidehen#this>. or this: <http://graph.facebook.com/richard.cyganiak> foaf:knows <http://graph.facebook.com/kidehen>. ? Thanks, Richard > > And yes, that's owl:sameAs: > > https://graph.facebook.com/605980750#this . > > Re. this whole matter of Names and Address ambiguity relative to usefulness, > Facebook doesn't really grok the above, neither does it grok fact that: > > <https://graph.facebook.com/130118787030077#this> owl:sameAs > <https://www.facebook.com/kidehen#this>, > <https://graph.facebook.com/605980750#this> . > > Instead of burning cycles getting them to think along the lines above, best I > get something made that takes advantage of this insight for the time being :-) > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > President& CEO > OpenLink Software > Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen > > > > > >
