On 7/12/11 11:21 PM, Pablo Mendes wrote:
Thanks, Thomas.
Giovanni, it was a coreference resolution problem from my side. You
meant 'they'=datasets and I read 'they'=people. It was anyhow a
possible question to come by and it's (hopefully) clearer now. Sorry
for the confusion.
Now to the intended question.
I will discuss the issue of availability with my colleagues. But my
personal opinion is that availability is an important quality
indicator, and should be incorporated if feasible wrt to time and
resource availability. Could we perhaps have others (e.g. Sindice,
Openlink cloud cache, etc.) also providing their assessment of this
specific indicator? It sounds like it's of shared interest and could
benefit from multiple independent assessments.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Pablo
On Jul 12, 2011 10:54 PM, "Thomas Steiner" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Datasets that are inaccessible for large amounts of time (e.g., 3+
months) ultimately undermine the LOD cloud. Rather than removing a
dataset, why not color code LOD cloud bubbles using the same color
scheme from: http://labs.mondeca.com/sparqlEndpointsStatus/index.html,
if possible?
For better or for worse, the LOD cloud pictorial is now a staple re.
Linked Data marketing comms. collateral.
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President& CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
