Michael,
On 7/22/2011 11:19 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Patrick,
So, perhaps one day it will be a standard, but not today.
Good catch! Did you join the Pedantic Web [1] group, yet? We need more
people like you.
Just signed up yesterday.
I have the soul of an editor. ;-)
More than happy to inveigh on behalf of "clean" data but suspect being
able to cope with "dirty" data is at least as important if not more so.
Hope you are at the start of a great week!
Patrick
Hope you are nearing a great weekend!
Yes, indeed, I plan to go to DERI FAWM now and allow my brain to be
off-line till 15:00 UTC tomorrow, in case anyone cares ...
Cheers,
Michael
[1] http://pedantic-web.org/
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html
On 22 Jul 2011, at 16:11, Patrick Durusau wrote:
Michael,
On 7/22/2011 10:42 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Probably VoID metadata/dataset URIs will be easier to discover once
the /.well-known/void trick (described in paragraph 7.2 of the W3C
VoID document) is widely adopted.
greed. But it's not a 'trick'. It's called a standard.
Is it?
Yes, I think that RFC5785 [1] can be considered a standard. Unless
you want to suggest that RFCs are sorta not real standards :P
RFCs can be standards, but there is a path by which RFCs become
standards.
As of today, the RFC 5785 header reads "PROPOSED STANDARD."
So, perhaps one day it will be a standard, but not today.
Hope you are nearing a great weekend!
Patrick
Cheers,
Michael
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5785
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html
On 22 Jul 2011, at 15:39, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 09:59 +0100, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Frans,
[snip]
Probably VoID metadata/dataset URIs will be easier to discover once
the /.well-known/void trick (described in paragraph 7.2 of the W3C
VoID document) is widely adopted.
greed. But it's not a 'trick'. It's called a standard.
Is it?
There was me thinking it was a Interest Group Note.
Is there a newer version than:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/NOTE-void-20110303/
?
Dave
--
Patrick Durusau
[email protected]
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net
Homepage: http://www.durusau.net
Twitter: patrickDurusau
--
Patrick Durusau
[email protected]
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net
Homepage: http://www.durusau.net
Twitter: patrickDurusau
