On 11/18/11 5:19 AM, Steffen Lohmann wrote:
On 17.11.2011 17:35, Kingsley Idehen wrote:On 11/17/11 9:34 AM, Steffen Lohmann wrote:Hi all,we are pleased to announce version 1.0 release of the "Modular Unified Tagging Ontology (MUTO)". MUTO is an attempt to unify the core concepts of existing tagging ontologies (such as TAGS, TagOnt, MOAT, etc.) in one consistent schema. We reviewed available ontologies and created a compact core ontology (in OWL Lite) that supports different forms of tagging, such as private, group, automatic, and semantic tagging. MUTO should thus not be considered as yet another tagging ontology but as a unification of existing approaches. We hope it will be useful to the community and a helpful starting point for future extensions.For more information, please see the specification at http://purl.org/muto/core# (redirect to http://muto.socialtagging.org)Best, SteffenGreat stuff!Wondering if you could add rdfs:isDefinedBy relations to this ontology? Doing so makes it much more navigable.Sure. I just forgot adding it. Thanks to point me to this, Kingsley. The rdfs:isDefinedBy statements are now included.Here's the current state of affairs showcasing limited TBox navigability:1. http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http://purl.org/muto/core 2. http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fmuto%2Fcore%23tagMeaning&urilookup=1 .Once you add the isDefinedBy relations, the ontology description page becomes the launch pad for powerful FYN exploration across both the ontology TBox and and associated ABox.Looks very nice. Thanks, Steffen
Steffen, Great! Effects of your tweak:1. http://uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fmuto%2Fcore%23meaningOf&urilookup=1 -- picked a property from your ontology as a random starting point
2. http://uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fmuto%2Fcore%23 -- pivot to the main ontology where the system leverages inverse relations courtesy of isDefinedBy .
As already highlighted by Richard, adding owl:equivalentClass and owl:equivalentProperty relations will lead to more enrichment esp. manifestation of instance data. All you have to do is add the relations and Linked Data power will handle the rest :-)
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
