On 1/6/12 8:34 AM, Augusto Herrmann wrote:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Kingsley Idehen<[email protected]>  wrote:
What about the Microdata in the HTML? Is that as sparse as the RDFa re.
triples embedded in the HTML?
I think embedding both RDFa and Microdata in the same HTML would
complicate matters greatly, and we'd have to settle for one of them
for the VCGE data.

Not asking you to mix them. Saying, look at how we deal with it via <link/> relations, for instance.

Re. URIBurner, note its ability to produce both RDFa and Microdata from the
RDF it negotiates. Ditto JSON-LD :-)
It's really cool that there's RDFa in the generated URIBurner code!
However, I could find no Microdata embedded into the HTML (e.g. a
search for "itemprop" returns empty):

$ curl -s 
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fvocab.e.gov.br%2F2011%2F03%2Fvcge%23imigrantes
| grep itemprop

Look at the footer of a URIBurner page. Or look in <head/> or look at the "Link:" response headers re. alternative representation formats .


Is a particular parameter required in order to return HTML5 +
Microdata from URIBurner? I found that adding a parameter
output=application%2Fmicrodata%2Bjson to the URL does return data in
the application/microdata+json format, but I found no way to get it
embedded into HTML.

Also, about the generated RDFa, I found this bit a little strange
(intentation added by myself):

<body about="http://vocab.e.gov.br/2011/03/vcge#imigrantes";>
...
     <ul class="obj">
         <li>
             <span class="literal">
                 <!-- 43 -->
                 <a class="uri" rel="rdf:type"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#";
href="/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2004%2F02%2Fskos%2Fcore%23Concept">Concept</a>
             </span>
         </li>
     </ul>
...
</body>

This produces the following triple (see RDFa distiller [1]):

<http://vocab.e.gov.br/2011/03/vcge#imigrantes>  a
<http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2004%2F02%2Fskos%2Fcore%23Concept>
  .

Shouldn't the type be just
<http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept>, as asserted in the
source material, instead of escaping the URL around URIBurner?

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/

Regards,
Augusto Herrmann




--

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen






Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to