On 3/23/12 11:35 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
On 23 Mar 2012, at 14:05, Jonathan A Rees wrote:2012/3/23 Melvin Carvalho<[email protected]>:I dont think, even the wildest optimist, could have predicted the success of the current architecture (both pre and post HR14).The votes of confidence are interesting to me, as I have not been hearing them previously. It does appear we have a divided community, with some voices feeling that 303 will be the death of linked data, and others saying hash and 303 are working well. Where the center of gravity lies, I have no way of telling (and perhaps it's not important as long as any disagreement, or even ignorance, remains). As Larry Masinter said at the last TAG telcon, things do not seem to be converging.I'm sure many people are just deeply bored of this discussion.It's probably important, but I'm beginning to suspect that there isn't actually a "right" answer. - Steve
Steve,Methinks the right answer is: leave HttpRange-14 alone, in due course the WWW will sort this all out, naturally :-)
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
