On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 16:43 +0000, Jeni Tennison wrote: > Thanks James, > > I've substituted that text in. >
Thanks, The document makes it unclear how an agent should handle provenance for NIR URI with a 200 response. If a :describedby relationship exists, should an agent assume that the object of that relationship contains the same information the probe URI response does? Is it okay for a single agent to use the probe URI (with a 200 response) as both an identifier for the documentation and an identifier for the NIR it describes? Regards, James
