On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 11:55 +0900, トーレ エリクソン wrote:
[ . . . ]
> If we agree that
>
> _:a a rdfs:Class;
> rdfs:comment "the set of things which can have
> their representations retrieved via HTTP";
> owl:equivalentClass rdfs:Resource.
>
> the interface between the web and the semantic web becomes much easier
> to understand.
+1 . . . almost. Except that I think you should remove the
owl:equivalentClass assertion, so that it is not *always* the same set
as rdf:Resource in *all* uses:
_:a a rdfs:Class;
rdfs:comment """The set of things which can have
their representations retrieved via HTTP.
Initially this is the same set as
rdfs:Resource. However, some applications
may choose to additionally constrain this
set.""" .
--
David Booth, Ph.D.
http://dbooth.org/
Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of his employer.
