On 5/22/12 4:55 AM, Dominic Oldman wrote:

Thanks Antoine.

I understand the need to be careful. The email was a bit of a whim at the end of the day. However, I would argue that we are not an isolated node we have simply used ontology has the linking method and we have a very high level of linkage (or harmonisation) with our partners who have used the same mapping system. I guess I could argue a little arrow to and from any CRM implementation without me inserting say some sameas triples (although, of course, I have no problem with this). Indeed our aim to create an environment for exploration across different object types, periods and cultures , not tie it down to pre-configured relationships.

Can you tell me the address of the LOD-LAM list?

Dominic

PS. We should be moving off our very limited Endpoint soon and providing a more robust production Endpoint with fewer limitations in the near future (with images).


What's the URL of your current endpoint?

Do you have some sample Linked Data URIs?

Kingsley

Dominic Oldman

*Deputy Head of IS *

*IS Development Manager*

*ResearchSpace Principal Investigator*

*British Museum*

+44 (0)20 73238796

+44 (0)7980 865309

www.BritishMuseum.org

www.ResearchSpace.org



--

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen





Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to