Nice for /us/ to reason the relatedness of these properties (and to the
standard ones we were already using - rdfs:label, rdfs:comment,
foaf:depiction, etc.), but those who saw fit to make things 'easier' are
stuck with the proliferation...
Barry
On 20/06/2012 19:52, Aidan Hogan wrote:
On 20/06/2012 18:58, Barry Norton wrote:
Does the fact that Web users now need to mark up their pages with
*og:description*, *schema:description* /and/ *twitter:description* not
make anyone in those communities think that maybe /this/ one had a point
in the first place?
And that maybe this proliferation is actually /harder /to manage than
dealing with (shock horror) multiple namespaces?
Did someone say reasoning?!
Cheers,
Aidan
P.S.,
http://vimeo.com/28667500
http://vimeo.com/28667555
