> Is that still the state of affairs? Are there any practical workarounds?
If I'm not totally misunderstanding what you're trying to achieve I'd argue
that VoID [1] and the SPARQL SD vocabulary [2] should be capable of doing the
job.
Tim, care to update the respective sentence in your document?
Cheers,
Michael
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/void/#backlinks
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-service-description/
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel.: +353 91 495730
WebID: http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i
On 4 Jul 2012, at 07:45, Heiko Paulheim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am wondering whether there is a way of finding a SPARQL endpoint for an LOD
> URI, i.e., a function f that behaves like
> f(<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Darmstadt>) = <http://dbpedia.org/sparql>
>
> TimBL's design issues document [1] says:
> "To make the data be effectively linked, someone who only has the URI of
> something must be able to find their way the SPARQL endpoint. [...]
> Vocabularies for doing this have not yet been standardized."
>
> Is that still the state of affairs? Are there any practical workarounds?
>
> Best,
> Heiko
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
>
> --
> Dr. Heiko Paulheim
> Knowledge Engineering Group
> Technische Universität Darmstadt
> Phone: +49 6151 16 6634
> Fax: +49 6151 16 5482
> http://www.ke.tu-darmstadt.de/staff/heiko-paulheim
>
>
