Hi Alan,
you are right. That is probably the correct question to answer lj's query.
lj, do you have a use case or a specific application in mind?
What kind of queries do you want to answer with the model and the data
you have?
All the best,
Sebastian
Am 05.07.2012 01:10, schrieb Alan Ruttenberg:
What are you trying to accomplish - how would you decide one solution is
better than some other?
On Tuesday, July 3, 2012, Leyla Jael García Castro wrote:
Hi all,
I am modelling the structure and content of document. I am using DoCO (
http://purl.org/spar/doco<http://www.essepuntato.it/lode/http://purl.org/spar/doco>)
for the structure, i.e. Section, Paragraph, etc.
Now I need to model the actual content in a paragraph, meaning the text in
it. Here an example:
<myDocumentURI> pattern:contains [ a doco:Section
; pattern:contains [ a doco:Paragraph
; -content property- "This is the text in the paragraph." ] ] .
What would be the best approach to do that? *bibo:content* (
http://bibliontology.com/) is deprecated so I do not want to use that
one; the recommendation there is to use *rdf:value*, that would be an
alternative. *sioc:conten*t is another alternative. It could also be *
c4o:hasContent* (http://purl.org/spar/c4o). I guess there are also other
alternatives out there.
Which one would be the best alternative? Any suggestions?
Thanks so much,
lj
--
Dipl. Inf. Sebastian Hellmann
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
Events: http://wole2012.eurecom.fr (*Deadline: July 31st 2012*)
Projects: http://nlp2rdf.org , http://dbpedia.org
Homepage: http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann
Research Group: http://aksw.org
