On Dec 5, 2012, at 08:46, Kingsley Idehen <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 12/5/12 7:55 AM, David Wood wrote:
>> On Dec 5, 2012, at 06:34, Chris Beer<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> 
>>> ><snip>
>>> >
>>>>> >>>http://www.manning.com/dwood/  itself doesn't seam to have any Linked 
>>>>> >>>Data
>>>>> >>>to consume;)
>>> >
>>> >Makes sense to me - if you know enough to look for LD resources at the
>>> >manning.com/dwood/ URI, you've just self evaluated that you probably don't
>>> >need the book! :P
>> I agree - and have been speaking with Manning about this.  Unfortunately, I 
>> haven't made any progress yet.  I'll keep trying!
>> 
>> Thanks for the mail.  Perhaps I can use it as proof to Manning that people 
>> do want LD on their site.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>> 
>> 
> Dave,
> 
> They have to understand that its sorta contradictory if they need to be 
> convinced of this matter :-)

Oh, I see your point and have made it myself.  Unfortunately, economics seems 
to be dictating otherwise to them for right or wrong.

The only productive suggestion that has been made to me is to put up a parallel 
site for the book that includes LD.  Michael Hausenblas has offered the domain 
linkeddatadeveloper.com, which was his original site for the book but has 
fallen into disuse.  Of course, I would need to be willing to pay for the site 
and take the time to operate it.

Would the community find that a useful thing to do?  I am willing to go to the 
effort if I receive a good number of positive responses.

Regards,
Dave


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to