Hi all,

On Dec 22, 2012, at 10:11, Gannon Dick <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think that route would be expensive for somebody.
> 
> A PURL rewrite (PURL software is available for download[1]) or a small change 
> to the RegEx in RFC 2396 would acomplish the same thing[2] and should be 
> considered first.
> 
> PURL development is moving to 3 Round Stones ...[3] Dr. Wood ?


Yep.  Callimachus 1.0 [1] now ships with a PURL service.  It supports all types 
of PURLs including the new "Active" PURLs, but does not yet support Partial 
PURLs.  We hope to do that in the next release or two.

PURLs are just another bit of network-hosted metadata, so it has always made 
sense to me to implement them using RDF and to integrate them into the LOD 
world.  We'll see if others think so too :)

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood


[1] http://callimachusproject.org


> 
> 
> 
> --Gannon
> 
> [1] http://www.purlz.org/ 
> [2] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
> [3] http://www.purlz.org/purl-news/purldevelopmentshiftingto3roundstones
> 
> 
> 
> From: Melvin Carvalho <[email protected]>
> To: Semantic Web <[email protected]>; Linked Data community 
> <[email protected]>; public-rww <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 7:57 AM
> Subject: Proposal: register /.well-known/sparql with IANA
> 
> May I propose that we register the well known address
> 
> /.well-known/sparql
> 
> with IANA.
> 
> This could be a sparql endpoint for the domain queried, and a helpful 
> shortcut for both web based discovery, and also write operations via sparql 
> update.
> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to