Hi, Cannot answer your first question, but I think the idea is worth exploring. You would need a few things: 1) A guarantee that the content at the page doesn't change without notice, so that comments/judgements refer to the correct thing. You can use some checksum-based method for this. 2) Some consistent format and annotation, to facilitate search. Not only from a computational perspective, we rely on some pattern (abstract/methods/result) to quickly scan some artifact. So ok, we can have some guidelines the research paper need to comply to (so we need a sort of validator). 3) Some guarantee of persistency. That could be supplemented by an established archives that can resolve dead URLs.... 4) A peer review sort of system, that in this case could be post-publication, maybe coupled with some new metrics. 5) A selection criteria could be useful as well.
I'm sure you know: http://figshare.com. They store different things (not executable), but no peer-review associated. For executable content, beside Javacript&webby thing, it could make sense to publish virtual machines these days. best, Andrea Il giorno 20/mar/2013, alle ore 11:36, Sarven Capadisli <[email protected]> ha scritto: > Dear community, > > I would like to know which venues (e.g., conferences, journals) are out there > that accepts research documents in (X)HTML+CSS+JavaScript+MathML+SVG etc. as > the primary and final format. On that note, which accepts an HTTP URI of the > research? > > As far as I know, there are none out there, but I want to be wrong about this! > > What I'm hoping for are a bunch of things: > > Although not ultimately necessary, a venue to submit to that would have some > weight given "reviewed and approved" stamps. > > Not being at the mercy of classical publishers needs when it comes to sharing > knowledge given the technologies that we have at our disposal. > > In the absence of such forward-looking venues, I would love to see an open > discussion on what's really needed to make it happen and be it the default > approach when it comes to sharing research findings. Pragmatic approaches are > always welcome, so, this doesn't have to be about "how to we make all > scholarly publishing get on the Web?", but rather for starters, "how do we > make scholarly work of Linked Data and Semantic Web researchers and > practitioners get on the Web"? > > I don't mean to belittle or overlook the hard work that some groups are > already actively involved in e.g., Semantic Web Journal, Semantic Web Dog > Food, FORCE11. I'm merely looking for more out of this community. > > For those that this sounds desirable, please voice yourself because there are > indeed many like you! > > Humbly yours, > > -Sarven > http://csarven.ca/#i >
