Well if I've understood correctly, uri4uri is an extreme version of
reification. rdfs: gave a way to describe a triple in triples but it
still related resources together, not the identifiers for those
resources. That makes it impossible to make statements about, say, what
authority assigned the URI and when.
On 01/04/2013 08:49, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
Hello Chris,
what a great step forward ! Now if the RDF WG would adopt this proposal,
LOD and RDF would really be ready to save the world!
http://www.brunni.de/extending_the_rdf_triple_model.html
Regards,
Michael Brunnbauer
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 12:13:19AM +0100, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
Apparently http://uri4uri.net/ launched today and claims to solves many
of the problems of Linked data. It looks promising..
--
Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg
University of Southampton Open Data Service: http://data.southampton.ac.uk/
You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
--
Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg
University of Southampton Open Data Service: http://data.southampton.ac.uk/
You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
