On 4/4/13 8:04 AM, Harry Halpin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Martynas Jusevičius <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:Hey Harry, HeltNormalt (http://heltnormalt.dk) is a danish entertainment content-publishing site built entirely on Linked Data principles, using Dydra triplestore (http://dydra.com) and Graphity Linked Data platform (http://graphity.org). Content negotiation was not implemented because of caching reasons (there is quite a high traffic), but RDF is accessible using a query parameter: http://heltnormalt.dk/striben/2011/03/09?view=rdf We presented a paper about its architecture at the W3C LEDP workshop: http://www.w3.org/2011/09/LinkedData/ledp2011_submission_1.pdf That's exactly the type of example I'm looking for. Any others?
That answers one of the two questions posed i.e., sites publishing RDF based Linked Data.
BTW -- do RDF based Linked Data publishing efforts from governments such as Italian, Portuguese, U.S., UK, EU etc.. count re. this matter?
At this juncture, there are still a significant number of companies that simply use RDF and maybe RDF based Linked Data as part of publishing pipelines that results in the kind of opaque HTML documents that triggered the recent Linked Data no-no meme [1].
Links:1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2013Mar/0212.html -- Why is it bad practice to consume Linked Data and publish opaque HTML pages?
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
