"My yardstick simply involves reliably servicing valid SPARQL queries with a valid response over valid large inputs. Can you do useful things with SPARQL at scale? Yes. Can you support a fully compliant SPARQL engine at scale? No. (Again, "I give up" or "here's a partial response" are not valid SPARQL responses.)"
would you also say that a ferrari is a slow car if you see it cruising in a speed limit zone? just started to read this paper "The Complexity of Evaluating Path Expressions in SPARQL" [1] i'll be back in seven and a half million years :) wkr turnguard [1] http://www.theoinf.uni-bayreuth.de/download/pods12submission.pdf -- | Jürgen Jakobitsch, | Software Developer | Semantic Web Company GmbH | Mariahilfer Straße 70 / Neubaugasse 1, Top 8 | A - 1070 Wien, Austria | Mob +43 676 62 12 710 | Fax +43.1.402 12 35 - 22 COMPANY INFORMATION | web : http://www.semantic-web.at/ | foaf : http://company.semantic-web.at/person/juergen_jakobitsch PERSONAL INFORMATION | web : http://www.turnguard.com | foaf : http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard | g+ : https://plus.google.com/111233759991616358206/posts | skype : jakobitsch-punkt | xmlns:tg = "http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard#";
