Sure. But I think it's a little unfair to the specification when, unlike
SPARQL-by-GET there is no requirement for a graph or any other
constructed parameter.
Barry
On 22/04/13 09:54, Leigh Dodds wrote:
Hi Barry,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Barry Norton <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm sorry, but you seem to have misunderstood the use of a graph URI
parameter in indirect graph addressing for GSP.
I wish all GSP actions addressed graphs directly, Queries were all GETs, and
that Updates were all PATCH documents, but a degree of pragmatism has been
applied.
I think Mark's point was that SPARQL 1.1/GSP specify a fixed query
parameter (query, graph) in the specification, requiring clients to
construct URIs rather than using hypermedia.
Cheers,
L.
--
Leigh Dodds
Freelance Technologist
Open Data, Linked Data Geek
t: @ldodds
w: ldodds.com
e: [email protected]
