On 04/25/2013 06:03 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Yes, clearly we have a common pain here - seeing CFPs that aren't easily LOD compatible. As others are saying, I think it boiled sown to the tools - if people (as organisers) aren't comfortable asking for stuff to be LOD-like because the authors won't stomach it, we should ask why, and how we can fix it.
First of all, I don't want to accept the idea that it all boils down to tooling without some evidence from the current views and practices out there. Hence, I created a document for us to create a questionnaire [1] in which we can send out and get some responses. It certainly needs to be improvement. But we can at least make more informed decisions based on data that's collected.
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Le3t_6oEDQUpA958gTFGdgvF5NPKLMcz4gcYx2PDn-E
-Sarven
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
