Hi, ok, from this the previous Kingsley post, you suggest metadata as annotation, and not structuring the content of the paper per se. Maybe one idea could be to provide a (x)html+RDFa (or even only a Turtle) template to fill for the submission. This, we can do... Should we draft one ?
ciao, Andrea Il giorno 25/apr/2013, alle ore 19:46, Sarven Capadisli <[email protected]> ha scritto: > On 04/25/2013 04:57 PM, Andrea Splendiani wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Ok, let's take a practical step. >> Let's assume we are going to open a call for a workshop and there we ask >> for "structured information". Which steps do we take and what do we need? >> >> If we want to move one step at a time, we would still need a site to >> handle the submission/review process (you cannot rely on online feedback >> for accepting/rejecting papers with no bias in a given timeframe). >> Something like easychair accepts the upload of extra files, so that >> could be used already off the shelf. >> >> Second, we need to specify where and how Redfin should be used. If we >> are in the sw/ld area, what for? We may ask for Uris for: >> Citations >> Authors >> Tools? Ontologies? >> >> What else ? >> >> Take for example the papers here: >> >> http://www.jbiomedsem.com/series/SWAT4LSCSHALS >> >> What would you propose for this kind o research? > > It could be practically anything that the authors find worthwhile to have an > URI for discovery. In addition to Kingsley's points, here are mine: > > * Problems, hypothesis, contributions, claims, results, conclusions > * If in the form of a blog post, comments, replies, reviews etc. on the page > could be invaluable. > * Licensing > > There is also some excellent work done with SPAR (Semantic Publishing and > Referencing Ontologies) [1], [2]. > > [1] http://sempublishing.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/sempublishing/SPAR/ > [2] > http://opencitations.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/introducing-the-semantic-publishing-and-referencing-spar-ontologies/ > > -Sarven > >
