On 6/10/13 4:26 AM, Víctor Rodríguez Doncel wrote:
While attribution may not be hindering any business, it would be nice being able to specify in a machine readable form the way it should be made...
Yes.In the case of DBpedia, we do require the exposure of DBpedia URIs in derived content. This is achievable in a number of ways as outlined in the project's imprint section [1].
Links:1. http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Imprint -- covers attribution best practices re., keeping DBpedia URIs discoverable to Web user agents.
Kingsley
Víctor El 10/06/2013 10:18, Leigh Dodds escribió:Hi,On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Kingsley Idehen <[email protected]> wrote:There have been a few recent threads on the LOD and Semantic Web mailing lists that boil down to the fundamental issues of profitability, business models, and Linked Data. Situation Analysis ================== Business Model Issue -------------------- The problem with "Data"-oriented business models is that you ultimately have to deal with the issue of wholesale data copying without attribution. That's the key issue; everything else is a futile dance around this concern.Why do you think that attribution is the key issue with data oriented businesses? I've spoken with a number of firms who have business models based on data supply and have never once heard attribution being mentioned as an issue for themselves or their customers. So I'm curious why you think this is a problem. Cheers, L. -- Leigh Dodds Freelance Technologist Open Data, Linked Data Geek t: @ldodds w: ldodds.com e: [email protected]
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
