On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Kingsley Idehen <[email protected]>wrote:
> Really? You are referring to a revision of the original meme [1]. And > when you digest that meme, please don't come back inferring that TimBL must > have been thinking about RDF when he produced outlined the four points in > his original GOLDEN meme. Who cares about the revisions from way back in 2006? We care about what the document says *today*. And it mentions RDF. So do the top 3 results of the Google result for "linked data" [1][2][3]. But I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. Do we both agree that RDF is a fundamental requirement for data to be called "Linked Data"? 1. http://linkeddata.org/ 2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_data 3. http://www.w3.org/standards/semanticweb/data
