On 6/19/13 5:21 PM, David Booth wrote:
On 06/19/2013 08:33 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:Maybe subject of another thread, but this is your fundamental assumption: every one that subscribes to this list assumes that Linked Data and RDF are one and the same thing.Kingsley, it has been REPEATEDLY pointed out to you that neither I nor (AFAICT) *anyone* else on this list believe that Linked Data and RDF are "one and the same thing". And yet you continue to make this blatantly false claim. PLEASE STOP!!!Please have the professional integrity to avoid such obviously false characterizations of other people's positions. They are destructive to what could otherwise be a legitimate debate about how this community chooses to define the term "Linked Data". And they are DAMNED ANNOYING.The only way we are going to make constructive progress on this list is if those with differing views honestly try to *understand* those differing views and attempt to address them *accurately*, rather than repeatedly making provocative misleading caricatures of them.Thank you, David
David,Where do we differ? Please make this clear in your own words. I will then respond. Again, you can keep the tone civil this is a debate. Hopefully, there will be a positive outcome for at least one of us.
BTW -- I also have a reply to your earlier mail where I specifically point out where I disagree with the manner in which you are framing the relationship between RDF and Linked Data. That post might be helpful here too.
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
