Ah, now yer rocking! But you didn't mention sed (and vi) :-) On 22 Jun 2013, at 18:57, "Young,Jeff (OR)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hugh, > > Sorry, you're right. I overlooked the "non-technical uses" phrase in > Dominic's message. > > Let me spin it a little differently, then. If you're a techie, you can use > these tools to create N-Triple data-dumps that non-techies can download and > use with Unix-style commands like grep and sort and wc. > > Jeff > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Hugh Glaser [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 1:53 PM >> To: Young,Jeff (OR) >> Cc: [email protected]; public-lod@w3 org >> Subject: Re: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - >> where are they? >> >> Hi Jeff, >> I assume you aren't suggesting that such tools are suitable for "non- >> technical users", as Dominic asked. >> So you must be saying something else? >> That it is pretty easy, but people don't do it? >> Hugh >> >> On 22 Jun 2013, at 17:27, "Young,Jeff (OR)" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> It's pretty easy to write an XSL stylesheet to convert "records" into >> RDF/XML, and then write a little M/R job to run the XSL against a big >> bulk of records to boil it down. >>> >>> The intellectual challenge is the semantic mapping of idiomatic data >> into RDF vocabulary terms. >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> From: Dominic Oldman [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 12:16 PM >>> To: public-lod@w3 org >>> Subject: Big data applications for general users based on RDF - where >> are they? >>> >>> >>> Why are there so few useful linked data applications for general non >> technical users that provide functions that people need to support and >> enhance their work and which operate over large amounts of data owned >> by different organisations with a high degree of semantic >> interoperability and robustness? >>> >>> Dominic >>> >>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android >>> >>> >> > >
