On 6/24/13 11:05 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
Hello Kingsley,

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:12:43AM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Sorry for PGP-signing my last couple of mails. I guess this is not good
practice on mailing lists.
I sign my emails using an X.509 certificate that includes a person URI
in its SAN slot :-)
Hmm... if your

  Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature";

is OK, my

  Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

should be OK too.

Yes.

Or are there less problems with S/MIME for some reason ?

There shouldn't be. It might be that pkcs#7 signature attachments are pre-configured as a known or acceptable attachment format. I guess one for the W3C admins responsible for the infrastructure behind this list.


So I will keep signing my mails to the list until someone gives me a reason
not to.

Yes.


Regards,

Michael Brunnbauer



--

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen





Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to