Milorad,
You should mint the URIs in your own namespace. You should only mint
URIs within a URI space that: (a) you own; or (b) you have been
authorized by the owner to use for minting URIs. See:
http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#uri-ownership
Minting URIs in someone else's URI space without their permission is
known as "URI squatting".
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0162.html
It is considered anti-social, as it violates web architecture.
David
On 08/07/2013 12:19 PM, Frans Knibbe | Geodan wrote:
Hello,
I hope understand the question, but wouldn't the second option (d2:R
rdf:type d2:C2) result in an URI that can not be dereferenced because
the resource does not exist at the external server? If that is true, I
believe one 'official' rule that would be broken is the third principle
of Linked Data:
"When someone looks up aURI, provide useful information, using the
standards (RDF*, SPARQL)".
Regards,
Frans
On 7-8-2013 15:20, Milorad Tosic wrote:
Hi,
I am a new member of the list. I am Professor at University of Nis and
entrepreneur actively working in the Semantic Web/Lined Data filed for a
while. This is a questing that I originally posted on Jena-users list,
but I was suggested that I should post it here also.
Let us given an ontology O1 under development that has assigned domain
"d1:". So, we have ownership of O1. For development of the O1 we find
useful to use some knowledge defined in an ontology O2 with domain
"d2:". Note that the O2 is an externally
defined ontology not in our administration scope. Let's now assume we
want to create a resource that would be an individual from the class
"d2:C", where the class is defined in O2.
What should be best practice to do: "d1:R rdf:type d2:C2" or "d2:R
rdf:type d2:C2"?
I believe both are conceptually correct statements
but I am not sure whether the second statement is in accordance with
Linked Data principles.
Is there a strong "official" argument (backed by a standard, for
example, or a
recommendation from a standard body ...) supporting this opinion that
can be used in argumentation?
Thanks,
Milorad Tosic
