I agree.  Nobody has told the surveillance state that "Enumerating Badness" is 
a dumb idea.
http://www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/editorials/dumb/
Then they have to get used to the idea that voter assistance is something 
different than  counting voters or "Enumerating Goodness".  It's not easy being 
a surveillance state, the fads are unreliable :-)




________________________________
 From: ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <[email protected]>
To: Gannon Dick <[email protected]>; semantic-web <[email protected]>; 
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: voting assistance applications and use of semantic technologies
 


The current state of the art favors the surveillance state, because the 
selection of the issue statements,  which are at the heart of the VAA 
application engine doing the matching does not use semantic technologies and is 
thus narrow focused as indicated by literature.


 
Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
Project Paradigm: A structured approach to bringing the tools for sustainable 
development to all stakeholders worldwide by creating ICT tools for NGOs 
worldwide and: providing online access to web sites and repositories of data 
and information for sustainable development

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.



________________________________
 From: Gannon Dick <[email protected]>
To: ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <[email protected]>; semantic-web 
<[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: voting assistance applications and use of semantic technologies
 


Milton,

It's only my opinion, but when "The Surveillance State" seems quite convinced 
that voter suppression (the opposite of your goal) is possible with semantic 
methods, then perhaps a step backwards toward determinism might be wise.  I am 
not suggesting that you change your methods, only that politicians and 
political parties are well skilled in hiding events they do not want 
remembered.  The process is not random.  Semantic methods may be of some help, 
but the knowledge that statistical methods  *already* fail makes semantic 
methods potentially more helpful, at least as far as assessing the coverage of 
the search.

Something like this may help to insure that the "map" of recent history does 
not have any missing names.  It does not make uncovering gaps in a particular 
CV any easier
 (sorry).

http://www.rustprivacy.org/faca/view/

--Gannon






________________________________
 From: ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <[email protected]>
To: semantic-web <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 11:24 AM
Subject: voting assistance applications and use of semantic technologies
 


I am currently doing a small research project involving voting assistance 
applications (VAAs) which help voters reach informed decisions on which 
political parties or candidates suit best their own personal political 
preferences.

Since VAAs apply algorithms withe weights and are based on analyzed texts 
searched for key concepts the question begs itself. Is there literature 
available which documents VAAs using semantic technologies to scour linked data 
for content to draw up historical patterns of candidates and parties to use in 
VAAs?

Politicians should be judged on what they promise now and what they have 
achieved, and for the latter we need analyzed historical track records in which 
semantic technology use in e.g. analysis of linked data maybe of some use.

We welcome pointers to literature and projects, past, ongoing or planned on 
this issue.

 
Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
Project Paradigm: A structured approach to bringing the tools for sustainable 
development to all stakeholders worldwide by creating ICT tools for NGOs 
worldwide and: providing online access to web sites and repositories of data 
and information for sustainable development

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
message contains
 confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you 
are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this 
e-mail.

Reply via email to