Thank you Bjorn Bernadette and others who replied will think - looks there's more than what is the spec (between the lines) Pdm
should have added perhaps <rethorical> <g> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Bernadette Hyland <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Paolo, > It means that JSON-LD is working its way through the W3C Candidate > Recommendation process now. [1] My editorial - It is good news IMO that a > bridge between the JSON developer community & Linking Open Data project has > been forged. I encourage you to read the CR doc & provide feedback. > > FYR: > "This document was published by the RDF Working > Group<http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/>as a Candidate Recommendation. This > document is intended to become a > W3C Recommendation. If you wish to make comments regarding this document, > please send them to [email protected] > (subscribe<[email protected]?subject=subscribe>, > archives <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/>). > W3Cpublishes a Candidate Recommendation to indicate that the document is > believed to be stable and to encourage implementation by the developer > community. This Candidate Recommendation is expected to advance to Proposed > Recommendation no earlier than 01 October 2013. All comments are welcome." > > Cheers, > Bernadette Hyland > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-json-ld-20130910/ > > > On Sep 30, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Paola Di Maio <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Greetings > > Lately was thinking, at the back of my head would JSON ever become a W3C > recommendation/standard , but I was not sure if it was a sensible thought. > > Today I came across this announcement > > > http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2013/09/11/json-ld-feature-freeze-and-call-for-implementation/ > > Could someone kindly comment/explain what does thsi mean.if this could be > a step toward JSON becoming a W3C standard, > > thank you > > PDM > > PDM > > >
