On 9-10-2013 2:18, Rob Warren wrote:
Agreed, a few small additions to void would go a long way to making automated
query engines. Either that or good quality HTTP error reporting? -Rob
Shouldn't that be the SPARQL Service Description instead of VoID? In my
mind, SPARQL endpoints and datasets are separate entities.
On 2013-10-08, at 11:45 AM, Leigh Dodds wrote:
Hi,
As others have suggested, extending service descriptions would be the
best way to do this. This might make a nice little community project.
It would be useful to itemise a list of the type of limits that might
be faced, then look at how best to model them.
Perhaps something we could do on the list?
Cheers,
L.
--
--------------------------------------
*Geodan*
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)
T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E [email protected]
www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer
<http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
--------------------------------------
