Why don't you invent one and publish a reasonably exact specification of it (ideally, a grammar for its legal lexical strings and an unambiguous specification of its lexical-to-value mapping)? Then other people can use it also. The world needs such a thing.
You don't need a licence from the W3C to create a datatype :-) Pat Hayes On Nov 12, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Svensson, Lars <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > Milorad wrote: >> I was wandering maybe someone have any advice how to approach >> modeling the following construction that is in my opinion closely related to >> your question but stated in somewhat more general manner: > > Thanks for your pointers. Before this discussion turns into a forum on how > to _model_ temporal resources, I'll just throw in that I'm not looking for an > owl ontology or any kind of elegant data model, but just a simple datatype > that I can use like this: > > my:event ex:tookPlaceDuring > "2007-03-01T13:00:00Z/2008-05-11T15:30:00Z"^^some:datatype . # The interval > is an ISO 8601 expression for from-to > > Is there any known datatype I can use for "some:datatype" in the example > above? I want to keep it simple... > > Thanks, > > Lars > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile (preferred) [email protected] http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
