Hi all Reading the thread, I was also thinking about a FRBR-ish approach. Maybe you will not use the exact FRBR classes, but the spirit of it See http://bvatant.blogspot.fr/2013/07/frbr-and-beyond-its-abstraction-all-way.html
2013/12/5 Damian Steer <[email protected]> > > On 5 Dec 2013, at 13:52, Thomas Steiner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear Public-LOD, > > > > Thank you all for your very helpful replies. Following your joint > > arguments, owl:sameAs is _not_ an option then. > > You could use dc:hasFormat to link them: > > "A related resource that is substantially the same as the pre-existing > described resource, but in another format." [1] > > <http://ex.org/video.mp4> dc:hasFormat <http://ex.org/video.ogv> . > > <snip> > > > The most reasonable > > thing to do seems to introduce some sort of proxy object, on top of > > which statements can be made. > > I prefer this. It feels FRBR-ish [2][3] although that's not quite right. > (Are the individual videos items, and the proxy object a manifestation?) > > Damian > > [1] <http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-hasFormat> > [2] < > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_Requirements_for_Bibliographic_Records > > > [3] <http://vocab.org/frbr/core.html> > -- *Bernard Vatant* Vocabularies & Data Engineering Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 Skype : bernard.vatant http://google.com/+BernardVatant -------------------------------------------------------- *Mondeca* 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France www.mondeca.com Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews> ----------------------------------------------------------
