On 01/30/2014 09:10 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 1/30/14 1:09 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
If not bad, is there any provision for allowing that an HTTPS URI
that only differs in the scheme part from HTTPS URI be identified
as the same resource?
http and https are fundamentally different resources, but you can link
them together with owl : sameAs, I think ...
Yes.
You simply use an <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#sameAs> relation to
indicate that a common entity is denoted [1] by the http: and https:
scheme URIs in question.
does it make sense then to use https: IRIs if we state that one can
treat http: version as equivalent?
