On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Simon Spero <[email protected]> wrote: > Whilst Peter may have some memory lapses about some ambiguous parts of the > OWL spec :), I do not believe that he has false memories of co-editing the > second edition of the RDF Semantics document. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-mt-20140225/
Sorry didn't know he was the co-editor of the spec. Anyway it doesn't hurt to clarify whether RDF actually holds any meaning for triples. I always presumed that was part of the vocabularies and not part of RDF.
