Yes, in fact, I have been using a dump from that site for most of my preliminary work. But there is no working SPARQL endpoint, and there is often a big gap between dumps. Plus, there are other datasets I want to use as well. I am trying to understand the benefits of using these platforms that bring everything together.
Bonnie MacKellar [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Luca Matteis [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 5:24 PM To: Bonnie MacKellar Cc: public-lod@w3 org ([email protected]) Subject: Re: Bio2RDF vs Linked Life Data Have you looked at this: http://linkedct.org/ ? There seem to be lots of different URIs for the same resource define by Bio2RDF, LLD and LinkedCT so I'd choose the provider with most up-to-date results. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Bonnie MacKellar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I notice that several datasets I am interested in appear both on the > Bio2RDF and Linked Life Data platforms. I want to integrate some of > the data contained in these data sets for an application. Is there an > advantage to using one platform over the other? Do they both provide > dumps of the triples? Are they up to date (for example, both contain > clinical trial data, which should be up to date to be useful).? I > have spent some amount of time searching for written comparisons and > am coming up with nothing. Sorry if this is an elementary question, but I am > just digging into this right now. > > > > Thanks, > > Bonnie MacKellar > > [email protected] > >
