Hi Mike, you’re probably talking of a “framing” ontology that “unifies" sets of 
properties for certain entities?
This Infobox-like structure is missing from DBpedia for example, as I described 
in [1].
Probably the oldest ontology pattern for that is Descriptions and Situations 
[2], also embedded in the DOLCE+DnS-Ultralight (DUL) foundational ontology [3].
Aldo

[1] http://www.slideshare.net/gangemi/isemantics-key
[2] http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/descriptionandsituation.owl
[3] http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl

On Jul 11, 2014, at 4:42:26 AM , Mike Bergman <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> I have been looking for an ontology that organizes and describes possible 
> characteristics or attributes for common entity types, such as what might be 
> found in a key-value pair in Wikipedia infoboxes and such.
> 
> I have had no luck finding such a vocabulary or ontology. The closest 
> representation I found was one related to sensors and the Internet of Things 
> (IoT) [1]. The Wolfram Language also has an interesting structure around 
> units [2]. Biperpedia has recently been discussed by Google [3], but no 
> actual ontology or structure yet appears available for inspection.
> 
> Does anyone know of a general ontology for capturing record/entity attributes 
> or characteristics (properties)? I know some domains like biomedical may have 
> partial approaches to this, but I'm seeking something that has as its intent 
> being a general-purpose attribute reference.
> 
> Suggestions or pointers would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Thanks, Mike
> 
> [1] 
> http://eprints.eemcs.utwente.nl/23734/01/CICARE2013_-_Brandt_et_al_-_Semantic_interoperability_in_sensor_applications_-_final_version.pdf
> [2] http://reference.wolfram.com/language/guide/Units.html
> [3] http://infolab.stanford.edu/~euijong/biperpedia.pdf
> 


Reply via email to