On 10/1/14 2:42 PM, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
can't use them along with schema.org.I favour plain HTML+CSS+RDFa to get things going e.g.:https://github.com/csarven/linked-research
What about: HTML+CSS+(RDFa | Microdata | JSON-LD | TURTLE) ? Basically, we have to get to: HTML+CSS+(Any RDF Notation) .The above is possible because we now have standardization of <link/>, <script/> etc.. in HTML that makes this possible.
I wouldn't single out RDFa in this quest.History has shown that whenever we single anything out anything, at the notation level, we inevitably open up a new format centric war. These wars simply protract all the confusion that swirls around RDF :)
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
