On 6 March 2015 at 11:04, Ghislain Atemezing <[email protected]> wrote:
> Melvin, > > Le 6 mars 2015 à 10:56, Melvin Carvalho <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > OPO would be a good match, but is the vocab / project still alive? > > > If you really want to use OPO, you can visit the page in LOV at > http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/vocabs/opo where > - you can have the names of the creators/contributors and send them an > email > - scroll down the page in vocab history and download the latest version > uploaded in LOV (in 2010) . > Thanks. My major concern is that the vocab is no longer online. I do like a lot of the terms there. There is a trade off between reusing them or making my own simpler vocab. Im just trying to work out which, and see if anyone is still maintaining this. Normally the library I use will try and dereference the vocab so if it's blank that's going to give me warnings, which I'd rather not have. > > HTH > > Ghislain >
