Hi Sarven,
I need to be *very* careful how I say this or I am going to get so much
flak for promoting a workshop on this list ;-), but I can't help but
point out that this topic is very much in scope of
https://www.w3.org/2016/11/sdsvoc/
Format/serialisation/Mime Type, whatever, is not enough. You need to
know the profile. Erik Wilde has an internet draft on this [1] too.
That approach - using HTTP Linked Headers is probably the simplest.
Should we also consider it as another dimension of content negotiation?
For example, I might ask a catalogue for metadata about a given dataset
using DCAT-AP, or DDI and that's independent of whether it's in JSON,
Turtle or whatever.
Actually, I really do have to send out a CfP for that workshop, which I
will do, but not here, or I'll have to remonstrate with myself from now
until next year.
Phil.
[1] https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6906.txt
On 15/07/2016 15:16, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
On 2016-07-15 09:44, Ghislain Atemezing wrote:
Are there mediatypes that map to application/ld+json with a profile?
Only aware of application/activity+json
Not happy with this content here https://www.w3.org/ns/formats/ ?
Specially this line https://www.w3.org/ns/formats/data/JSON-LD ?
Thanks Ghislain.
I meant the equivalences that can be made between JSON conventions and
JSON-LD.
Is there anything out there that's treating a JSON mediatype with
application/ld+json + profile?
e.g., application/ld+json;
profile="http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams"; and
application/activity+json is one of those as far as I know.
Also raised this in GeoJSON-LD since GeoJSON uses application/geo+json:
https://github.com/geojson/geojson-ld/issues/41
If any, what else is out there?
-Sarven
http://csarven.ca/#i
--
Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1
