Le 19 avr. 2007 à 20:10, Dan Brickley a écrit :
Karl Dubost wrote:
We might issue a warning on this. Saying be careful you have a
conflict between the meta name and the http headers for your mime
type.
Is it really a conflict? Can a piece of content not genuinely fall
in two categories at once? Or is the rule that, even if this is
true in the abstract, ... for each HTTP transaction, there must be
exactly one mime type for the content.
1. The HTTP mime type MUST have precedence on everything else. So
what is proposed is a hack relying on an implementation bug.
2. I said warning, not error.
See CUAP
http://www.w3.org/TR/cuap
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
