Yes, I understand, At least I could specify the semantics for subject
resolution, object resolution, blank nodes, and so on
so if for example my language has a 'value' attribute and I want it to
be the object of triples I have to specify it in the semantic rules of
my language, isn't it? or otherwise I would need to duplicate it using
the content attribute, isn't it?
<a>
<b value="My Value"
about="http://blah";
property="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name";
/>
<b
about="http://blah";
property="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage";
resource="http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/";
/>
</a>
Thanks and best regards
----
José Manuel Cantera Fonseca
Telefónica I+D
----- Mensaje original -----
De: Mark Birbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: Jueves, Mayo 24, 2007 6:24 pm
Asunto: Re: PROPOSAL: Split RDFa into two pieces--core attributes, plus
language-specific 'interpretations'
Para: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
>
> Hi José,
>
> > I agree with your proposal, but I was thinking more in depth
> about it
> > and it seems to me that the RDFaCore spec is going to be
> something like
> > the spec of some attributes without anymore.
> > I mean, that, without the host language, you are not going to be
> able to
> > provide "semantics" to the RDF-A attributes.
>
> The idea is that RDFa-core still requires a host language--after all,
> it's only a collection of attributes--but the question is whether the
> host language provides any additional 'mappings', or not.
>
> For example, I might define a really simple XML language that contains
> only two elements, <a> and <b>, with <a> being the root element,
> containing any number of occurrences of <b>. I could then add
> RDFa-core to this language, and be able to produce mark-up like this:
>
> <a>
> <b
> about="http://blah";
> property="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name";
> content="Mark"
> />
> <b
> about="http://blah";
> property="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage";
> resource="http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/";
> />
>
>
> In my view, we should clearly define the processing rules for
> RDFa-core, so that the attributes work in all situations--which as it
> happens, we have pretty much already done. So the example above could
> be abbreviated to this:
>
> http://blah";>
> <b
> property="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name";
> content="Mark"
> />
> <b
> property="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage";
> resource="http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/";
> />
>
>
> Now, in my simple language, there are no other semantics, so RDFa-core
> gives me everything. But that isn't the case with HTML 4 or XHTML 1.x.
>
> Does that explain it better? Or have I missed your point?
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark
>
> --
> Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
> http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com
>
> standards. innovation.
>
>
begin:vcard
version:2.1
end:vcard
