On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 09:37:13 +0200, Ivan Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree with the general direction of your thoughts. @role is being
discussed by the XHTML group to be included into some future releases of
XHTML (I do not want to go into the debate of which version number this
will have:-). We should _not_ use that attribute and bring it forward,
so to say, to XHML1.1. I is not our role (sic!).
Formally, and to close the issue: I vote for @class as described.
I think that your argumentation doesn't count here Ivan.
We are 'bringing forward' several things, by creating an XHTML 1.1+RDFa.
What attributes we use are independent. @about is new too, but essential,
@role is already implemented in Firefox, and we can add it to the mix if
we want.
Don't muddy the waters please :-)
Steven
