Ben Adida wrote: >> >> - one small thing that you seem to forget: the @data attribute on the >> <object>. Do we remain silent on that, or do we include them on the same >> level and functionality as @src? I would propose to equate it with @src > > In a telecon, we leaned towards not specifying anything for @data at > this point, simply because there may be many ways to resolve this, and > it's not clear it's really necessary. Is this really important to you? > Is there a use case? >
Not a strong one. My almost only usage of object is when I want to include and svg file with a proper fallback. Ie: <object data="file.svg" type="....> <img src="fallback.png" ..../> </object> I may want to 'annotate' the included svg file exactly the same way as I do for images and may also want to add some things like <file.svg> role:fallback <fallback.png>. which would become a bit convoluted without that rule. I agree this is not a very compelling use case, so I will not have sleepness nights if this does not get included.... Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
