Hey folks,
We noticed two small bugs in the RDFa syntax document editors' draft. Since they may lead to misunderstandings if you're looking at the details, we immediately pushed out a new draft: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-rdfa-syntax-20070927 If you've already started reading the old draft, no problem, your comments will still be 99% useful. If you haven't started, use the new draft above. The diff is also available [1], showing very small changes. -Ben [1] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-rdfa-syntax-20070927/rdfa-syntax-diff.html
