Mark Birbeck wrote:
In the end, I don't think it is going to
matter that much. People are going to be using RDFa authoring tools to
write this stuff for them, anyway.
I have to strongly, strongly disagree! :) (Did I say strongly... ;))
This is something that I've heard so many times in other W3C groups,
when working on mark-up languages, and it simply never happens.
+1
Many a group are still waiting for the universally-appealing authoring
tool that never arrived (see also RDF/XML itself).
We're starting to see WYSIWYG HTML editors written in HTML/.js, and
there might be potential for editing RDFa that way, but ... people will
see the source, for sure. And they'll copy and paste it too.
Dan
